How can I choose appropriate films, TV and music videos for my family to
watch online on their computers, tablets, games console and smartphones?
The BBFC works with a number of on
demand services to provide trusted age ratings for video content available for
download and streaming online. Some of these platforms also provide parental
controls allowing parents to make available to their children films with an
appropriate age rating for them. The BBFC and home entertainment industry
recognise that this is helpful to parents when both they and their children are
selecting film or TV content to stream or download.
For more information about the pilot
to age rate music videos online, visit our Online Music Videos page.
Why are digital age ratings useful?
Providing BBFC age ratings for
online content allows viewers to make the same informed viewing and purchasing
choices for themselves and their families when using Digital Video Services, as
they do when visiting the cinema or renting or buying DVDs and Blu-ray.
In 2011 the BBFC commissioned some research which showed a public demand for the same BBFC ratings
to be available for online content as for DVDs and Blu-rays in shops and for
films at the cinema. The research found that 82% of parents prefer to download
films that are classified with the trusted BBFC age ratings, symbols and
BBFCinsight information. This research is available on our research page.
Online services and other places using BBFC age ratings
The BBFC age ratings can be found on
a number of Video-on-Demand platforms, content producers, film studios and
airlines. These include:
Services
Amazon Instant Video/Prime Instant
Video
BFI Player
British Airways High Life
BT TV
Curzon Home Cinema
DisneyLife
EE Film Store
Film 4OD
Find Any Film.com
Google Play
Google web search
Hopster
iTunes Movie Store
Kaleidescape
Netflix
Picturebox
Sainsbury's
TalkTalk TV Store
The Horror Show
Ultraviolet
Virgin Media
We Are Colony
Wuaki TV
X-Box Video (Microsoft)
Airlines
British Airways
Monarch
Thomson
Virgin Atlantic
BBFC has persuasion job over online
ratings
Online-only shows, such as
Netflix's House of Cards, are not legally covered by BBFC ratings so the
organisation is on a mission to persuade.
'House of Cards', starring Kevin
Spacey
7:41AM GMT 14 Mar 2013
"That is the family silver for
us," said Mark Dawson, chief digital officer for the British Board of Film
Classification, as he discussed the way the organisation's ratings logos - 18,
PG, U - have embedded themselves in public consciousness.
Everyone knows what the ratings mean,
and according to the BBFC's research at least, almost everyone agrees with its
assessment of what it is appropriate for young people to watch.
"We just implement the
guidelines, which are set by public consultation," said Mr Dawson.
In cinemas and shops, the judgment of
the BBFC's classifiers is protected by law. The 1984 Video Recordings Act and
insists that it gives an age rating to all commercially distributed films.
At the time this meant cinema and
video, and because of the way the law was written, it still does. The MPs of
1984, stirred by the "video nasty" furore, legislated without the
benefit of technological clairvoyance. Their definitions were broad enough to
cover DVDs or even films loaded on USB sticks, but not a world where digital
downloads from iTunes, or streaming from Netflix or Amazon's LoveFilm are
rapidly usurping "packaged med
Mr Dawson's task is to make sure the
BBFC's family silver maintains its value as the film industry migrates online.
Without statutory backup, his is a
job of persuasion. He must persuade film companies and the big digital
retailers and services to pay for their creations to be classified for online
consumption (as well as cinema and DVD) and to show the BBFC rating and
incorporate it into login controls so parents maintain their trust in the
system.
Progress has been made. Some 250,000
films have now been been classified for online consumption and major players
such as BT Vision and Netflix are using the ratings.
The BBFC is particularly pleased that
Netflix submitted its hit Washington-based remake of House of Cards for
classification. Made for the internet, and released as 13 episodes
simultaneously last month, it was widely seen as the start of an important
trend in entertainment. The BBFC gave all the episodes a 15 rating, except one,
which featured a graphic suicide and got an 18.
"We're not about censorship and
haven't been for a long time," said Mr Dawson. "We're about giving
people the information they need."
Netflix will surely test that claim later this year when it debuts
Hemlock Grove, another exclusive, created by Eli Roth. The director is best
known as the founder of the "torture porn" genre with his sadistic
2006 horror film Hostel. Subsequent imitators 2009's Grotesque and 2011's Human
Centipede 2, were both refused any classification.
Theoretically, if Netflix's adventure
in original content produce something so distasteful the BBFC does not award a
classification, it could simply go ahead and distribute it anyway.
"If self regulation doesn't work
then there is the possibility of new legislation," said Mr Dawson,
"it would take changing two words in the law."
He strongly emphasises, however, that
the BBFC is not seeking and would not seek new powers to regulate internet
firms and that the government supports its attempt to bring the online industry
on board voluntarily.
To prove it can work, the BBFC needs
to persuade Apple and Amazon, the dominant forces in internet film
distribution, to use respect and display its ratings.
No comments:
Post a Comment