Wednesday, 13 January 2016

research source Three

Internet predator, 19, who raped girls is 'every parent's worst nightmare'

A teenage internet predator who exploited Facebook to meet young girls so he could rape and abuse them was described as "every parent's worst nightmare" as he was jailed for six years today.








A teenage internet predator who exploited Facebook to meet young girls so he could rape and abuse them was described as
McDermott began grooming his victims after they became Facebook friends and began swapping "unremarkable'" messages, Minshull Street Crown Court in Manchester was told Photo: Cavendish Press


Elliott McDermott, 19, claimed three victims after befriending the youngsters on the social networking site then making arrangements to meet them.
McDermott took the virginity of one 14-year old girl after offering to buy her alcohol and cigarettes from an off licence in return for sex.
Today police branded him ''every parents worst nightmare'' after he admitted two charges of rape, three sexual assaults and three counts of grooming. He was also ordered to sign the sex offenders register indefinitely.
McDermott began grooming his victims after they became Facebook friends and began swapping ''unremarkable'' messages, Minshull Street Crown Court in Manchester was told.
His first victim was 12-years-old when he befriended her through Facebook. After sharing several messages over the internet they exchanged mobile numbers and he arranged to meet her at a house in Salford.
Between July and August last year. McDermott went to the victim's house and while there raped the young girl.
He then arranged to meet the victim a second time, after asking her to return headphones he had left at her house. They later met at a subway near to her home before going to a field where he raped and sexually assaulted the girl.
The second victim, then 14, was attacked in August 2011 after she had complained to McDermott on Facebook that she couldn't get anyone to buy cigarettes and alcohol for her from a local shop.
He immediately volunteered to help out and got her two bottles of vodka, and a pack of cigarettes. But he also said he expected sex in return.
The girl drank an entire bottle of vodka before going into Agecroft Park with him, where they had sex. McDermott was arrested by police in August last year after complaints against him had been made by one of the girls.
Then, while still on bail for offences against two of the three, he went on the following October to commit offences against his third victim, a 13-year-old girl he again met through Facebook, befriending her and arranging to meet her in a park in Irlams O'Height where he engaged in sexual activity with her.
The court heard McDermott, an only child, was ''less mature emotionally and socially than expected for his age.''
Lawyers said there was no evidence to suggest that he was deliberately trawling the internet seeking likely victims, and his actions were said to be ''opportunistic.''
But after the case Det Con Nicola Wood, of Greater Manchester Police Serious Sexual Offences Unit, said: "Without exaggeration, McDermott is every parent's worst nightmare.
"He trawled the internet and befriended young, vulnerable girls that he went on to rape or sexually assault.
"Some thought he cared about them but all were too young to consent to any sexual activity. A fact he knew full well but chose to ignore for his own sexual gratification.
"This has had a significant impact on all victims and their families and I hope they are reassured that he is now behind bars where he can no longer pose a threat.
"I would also urge parents to be mindful of who their loved ones are interacting with over the internet and to ensure their children are fully aware of the dangers and potential consequences of befriending strangers."
McDermott was also prohibited for an indefinite period from making any contact with the girls. His name will also be passed on to the Independent Safeguarding Authority which can impose restrictions on him.

research portfolio source two

Carly Ryan: A loving girl who fell prey to an online predator

Fun-loving and unfailingly friendly, Miss Ryan was anything but a morose, depressed emo.
Although she liked the subculture's clothing and music, she was more likely to wrap you up in a hug than turn away from you with a sneer.
Yet it was that accepting nature - and a near-death experience - that left Miss Ryan vulnerable to the advances of a foul, deviant predator.
Adding to the tragedy, the many rumours surrounding her death caused her family further anguish.
Some people assassinated her character, or assigned sinister motives to what was no more than a young girl's search for true love.
Growing pains
Born on January 31, 1992, Miss Ryan lived with her mother, Sonya, in Stirling.
"We had a close relationship, very open, and we got along very well - almost a friend-like relationship," Ms Ryan said during the trial.
Miss Ryan's innocence was shaken, however, when she nearly died in hospital.
She had suffered alcohol poisoning after being given drinks by older teens.
"Once she became well, she was determined to never drink alcohol again," Ms Ryan said.
That decision isolated her from her experimental peers and the internet became her outlet - particularly social networking website MySpace.
But her online habits were changed by her time in intensive care, reflecting her darker outlook.
She had email accounts with names like "jesusisrapingmyshoe" and "trashwhore13", and her MySpace name was "synthetic slut". Her website profile changed dramatically.
"There were images I was taken aback by . . . some dark art, really risque, dark and sexual images," Ms Ryan said.
"With the photo of Carly, I couldn't see her face . . . she had taken a three-part image of her chest, waist and legs wearing fishnet stockings and a bra."
Contrary to early reports, Miss Ryan was never a member of the controversial vampirefreaks.com site.
Her connection to it came through friends who, in turn, introduced her to the love of her life.

Web of deception
Brandon Kane was a 20-year-old, Texas-born, Victorian-raised emo, who played guitar and thought Carly was "hot".
For a 14-year-old going through the typical adolescent search for identity, he was a dream come true.
"She said Brandon was really cute and that she really liked him," Ms Ryan said.
"She was like a giddy teenager in love - really happy, really light and really excited."
Miss Ryan also began to communicate with Brandon's "adopted father", Shane.
Their chats made her friends uncomfortable.
Shane would speak to them on the phone, asking if they were bisexual and liked kissing girls.
With her 15th birthday party planned for January 26, 2007, Miss Ryan invited Brandon to attend.
He declined, saying he would be overseas, and offered to have Shane go in his place.
Ms Ryan was hesitant.
"I said to Carly that I didn't know this person and I wasn't sure it was a good idea," she said.
"Carly tried to assure me he was Brandon's dad, a security guard and that we would get along well."

Introductions
The man who arrived at the Ryan house in January 2007 was not Shane, the SAS commando who had worked as a bodyguard for goth rocker Marilyn Manson.
He was, in truth, a 47-year-old divorced father of three who lived with his mother.
"Shane" was but one of 200 fake identities operated by the father, who used web design jobs to cover up his plethora of constructs.
Others ranged from the tame "kuruptkoala" to the more risque.
His computer hard drives were filled with vampire trivia and child pornography.
"I may not be a kid anymore, but I tend to act much younger than I am," he wrote on his website.
"I do go for women somewhat younger than me usually . . . someone sexually adventurous."
The father had pursued a 14-year-old girl in the United States in 2002 and 2003.
In online exchanges, he referred to her as his "princess" and his "wife".
He had also communicated with a 14-year-old girl in Singapore, while using the alias "Nash".
She did not attend their planned meeting, leaving him in a rage.
The father told his online friends the girl "would pay" for standing him up, saying he would use "a young guy" to lure her out of her home.
He told a friend she would end up "looking like that packaged meat you get at Safeway".


Adelaide move
In January 2007 the father travelled to Adelaide to consummate his sexual obsession with Miss Ryan.
Confident of his success, he told his co-workers he was starting a new life in Adelaide. He was convinced the girl would accept him in place of the Brandon fantasy.
He received a less-than-warm reception on his arrival.
"He was stocky with thinning hair, had crooked teeth and walked hunched over like an ape," Ms Ryan said.
"Carly told me she thought he was gross."
Undaunted, the father spent time with Miss Ryan and her friends, goading them to kiss while he watched.
"I pulled away, she got angry and walked off," one girl said.
"Shane said, `Maybe she wouldn't have walked off if you had given her what she wanted'."
The father bought Miss Ryan corsets and dress-up costumes, peering over the change room doors while she tried them on.
At a party he became jealous, saying "Brandon is on the phone" if she spoke to other boys.
He slipped into her bed that night, whispering "I love you" and "I'll never let anything happen to you".


Growing rage
Discovering this was too much for Ms Ryan and she demanded the father stay away.
He retaliated by email, calling her a "child-abusing b..ch".
Upon his return to Victoria, he vented his frustrations to his eldest son.
"He said he wanted to `fix up' Carly," the eldest son said.
When his eldest son refused to help, the father turned to his youngest son - a boy he barely knew.
Then 17, the son had spent most of his life in foster care.
He had lived with his father for less than a month when he was invited to go to Adelaide.
Using the Brandon construct once again, the father convinced Miss Ryan to go to Victor Harbor, with him and his son, on February 19, 2007.

The murder
The next morning, her bashed, sand-choked and drowned body was found by passersby at Horseshoe Bay, Port Elliot.
Father and son returned to Victoria and met up with the eldest son.
"My father showed me his knuckles and asked, `Do these look bruised to you?'," the eldest son said.
"He told me that he had punched Carly Ryan in the face, that he had killed her, that he had `done the job'.
"He said he had punched her in the face, pushed her face into the sand and, after that, he had thrown her into the water."
Quickly, police connected "Shane" to Miss Ryan's death, and Victorian police swooped on the father.
They found him at his computer, logged in as Brandon and chatting with a 14-year-old girl in Western Australia.
Each man was charged with murder and extradited to South Australia.

The court case
Director of Public Prosecutions Stephen Pallaras, QC, publicly vowed to handle the case himself. He passed it on to his staff when the trial date clashed with his travel plans.
The father immediately claimed his youngest son was the one who used the Brandon identity.
He would try to blame the boy throughout their three years in custody.
The duo was ordered to stand trial in the Supreme Court in October 2009.
Before it began, Justice Trish Kelly ruled evidence of the father's pursuit of other teenagers was inadmissible and prejudicial.
A common legal ruling, the act kept the jury focused on evidence relating directly to Miss Ryan.
The father changed his tune during the trial, insisting neither he nor his son were killers.
He also claimed to be asexual, to have felt "like a step-dad" toward Miss Ryan, and to have collated false identities to write an expose on the internet.
In fiery exchanges with his son's lawyer, Bill Boucaut, the father protested his innocence.
"You're trying to make me seem sick and perverted," the father said.
"You're trying to make out like I'm some sort of predator . . . a sicko predator."
Mr Boucaut and prosecutor Tim Preston repeatedly attacked the father's contradictory evidence, branding it "elaborate lies".
The father was even more evasive when the jury was not present in court.
On two occasions his counsel, Nick Vadasz, sought to withdraw from the case due to "irreconcilable differences" with his client.
The court heard the father had written to other lawyers, seeking their opinions about Mr Vadasz.
The son, by contrast, did not take the stand.
Mr Boucaut told the jury there was nothing to connect his client to the murder, saying the evidence was "one-way traffic" pointing to the father.


The verdict
As the end of the trial drew near, the father's condition deteriorated markedly.
He sat shaking in the dock and his facial hair became unruly - under suicide watch, he had been denied the use of razors.
The jury deliberated for 10½ hours over two days.
They paused only to ask for Justice Kelly's assistance.
The jurors wanted to know if they could find one man guilty of murder and the other guilty of manslaughter.
Upon hearing that question, the son burst into tears.
"The short and simple answer to that is `yes'," Justice Kelly said.
She further explained to the jury they would need to be satisfied of many factors were they to find the boy guilty of either crime.
For him to be guilty of murder, she said, they had to be sure he either participated in the plot to kill Miss Ryan or encouraged the crime.
To be guilty of manslaughter, the son must have participated in a plot to do harm to Miss Ryan - resulting in her death - or encouraged his father to harm Miss Ryan in a fatal way.
The jury could not find the son guilty of the lesser offence of assisting an offender, because prosecutors had never charged him with that crime.
When, at 4.30pm on Thursday, the jury found him guilty of murder, the father showed no reaction.
The son was visibly relieved at news of his acquittal.
Arrangements were made for him to return to Victoria that night.
"He never did anything, he's a good boy," his grandmother said yesterday.
"His father pulled him into it, he shouldn't have been there.
"He's very sorry for all that's gone on... he's a good boy, you know."
Having spent three years in custody due to his father's manipulations, he now faces the unenviable task of rebuilding his life.
So, too, does Sonya Ryan.
Although the verdict brings some closure, nothing can return her daughter to her arms for one more hug.

Research portfolio Source one

Sexual predators turn to Web to snare victims

Most online dating companies do not conduct background checks

November 22, 2012|By Erin Meyer, Chicago Tribune reporter
Derrick Chaney may have come across as a catch on the dating website he used — successful, connectedand smooth-talking.
But when the 31-year-old Iowa woman Chaney courted online traveled to Illinois for their first date, he quickly turned from eligible bachelor to sexual predator, police said.
After weeks of Internet chats and phone conversations, the two met in January at an Aurora motel, where Chaney sexually assaulted the woman and held her prisoner, according to authorities.
Chaney, 37, of Aurora, was charged with sexual assault, unlawful restraint and kidnapping in a case that police and prosecutors say underscores the potential dangers of online encounters.
As the number of people looking for love on the Internet continues to balloon, so do concerns about such risks.
According to law enforcement officials, there's no way to know what percentage of sexual assaults is linked to online dating. But in providing access to millions of people, these Internet services offer a widening universe in which those intent on violence can prowl, experts say.
Had Chaney's alleged victim — or the online dating company that made their connection possible — obtained a criminal background check, it would have shown that he has a history of domestic violence and multiple felony convictions, records show.
With a few exceptions, online dating companies do not conduct background checks on users or verify their identities.
As a result, Illinois and several other states have passed measures aimed at making cyberspace safer.
A new state law called the Internet Dating Safety Act took effect in August and requires online dating websites to disclose whether they conduct background checks on members. Companies that violate the law face possible fines of up to $50,000.
Sen. Ira Silverstein, D-Chicago, who sponsored the legislation, said he originally wanted to make background checks compulsory. The law's disclosure requirement was a compromise with the industry.
"It's buyer beware," Silverstein said. "People go to these Internet dating services and maybe assume they do background checks."
A high-profile lawsuit that a California woman filed against Match.com, claiming that the company paired her with a registered sex offender, spurred the California attorney general to press for more screening. The woman allegedly was sexually attacked on the second date, according to reports.
Some leading online dating companies — eHarmony, Match.com and Spark Networks — pledged earlier this year to check users against sex offender registries, post safety tips and provide a way for users to report abuses online.
The online dating company True.com has been something of an activist in the industry. According to its website, it is "the only leading online relationship site that screens all communicating members against some of the largest criminal records databases on the Internet."
True also has filed lawsuits against people with felony criminal records and for misrepresenting themselves in their dating profiles, according to the company website. Many companies argue that even conducting full criminal background checks would not necessarily weed out the majority of predators and could give potential victims a false sense of security.
"We want to stress that while these checks may help in certain instances, they remain highly flawed, and it is critical that this effort does not provide a false sense of security to our members," Mandy Ginsberg, CEO of Match.com, said in a statement.
"People have to exercise common sense and prudence with people they have just met, whether through an online dating service or any other means."
Unique set of risks
To some extent, advocates agree.
Background checks are useless in many cases because sexual assault is underreported, underinvestigated and many offenders are not arrested, said Cindy Southworth of the Pennsylvania-based National Sexual Violence Resource Center. The organization heads a project focusing on the intersection between technology and violence against women.
"For background checks to be the litmus test could be problematic, but if it's one piece of the puzzle, that's a different story," said Sharmili Majmudar, executive director of Rape Victim Advocates in Chicago.
One alleged online predator had no record as a sex offender when he was charged in 2011 with raping two women in Chicago.
Ignacio Carrillo, 37, is expected in court next week on charges he sexually assaulted a woman he met online.
After having drinks one night in September 2011 at a Lincoln Park bar, the former executive at a Chicago public relations firm allegedly forced a 33-year-old Skokie woman against his Porsche in a nearby garage and assaulted her, according to prosecutors.
Carrillo later was linked by police to the 2009 sexual assault of a 38-year-old woman he allegedly met online. Both woman identified Carrillo by his dating profile, prosecutors said.

Saturday, 2 January 2016


My Mood-board
In my mood board i have gathered photos together to associate with my film idea, so first of all the series will be based around kidnap and murder through the use of social media, the two examples i have used are Misery and the film prisoners as examples. I also want to try and include situations such as hostage.

Research

Jose discussed how the genre of horror is beginning to die due to the frequent overused technique called a jump-scare. although he mentions that the film is still scary. between there are similar comments but they mention that the jump-scare had made this segment in the film.




Jump scares ruin a LOT of potentially good horror scenes. This is part of the reason why horror in general is dead.  I'll be perfectly honest. Heart was racing throughout but when the jump 'jump scare' happened I was disappointed.

Facts

The pay scale of film crew can be very expensive.  First of all, we have our production workers, Earn £250.00 per day.  Then we have our lighting crew, Earn £500.00 per day.  At this stage we have to decide whether it is a single camera or multi camera production.  This can affect how many camera operators we have on set.  With every good visual in a movie, it provides good sound. so a sound crew would be on £450.00 per day. 


Finance 

When wanting to create movies and you realise you need money they're certain methods for example

  • Kick-starter - is the world's largest website which help people fund ideas and projects over the world.

  • BFI - this stands for the British Film Institute which helps smaller companies get promoted.

  •  Private Finance - is a loan company which is used for specific specifications.

  • Investors - will venture into your projects and support you financial for either the whole of the cost or part of it with a group of other investors.

  • National lottery - offers funding on a charitable basis to charities who work on projects.

companies such as these invest money into small content creators.



Time

When trying to film your first short film, this will require us to be organised when hiring equipment from our college.  With this we will have to consider how many days we spend shooting and how long we will spend editing.  A reason to consider this is that it will give you the option to reduce costs and may leave a small budget for eventualities.    In order to keep the crew organised I would have call sheets which will keep my crew in order and prepared for any situations that they may face.


Facilities

When filming my production I will need obvious things such as lighting which will affect how professional my film looks.  Also I will require a tripod to hold the camera still.  For post production I will need an editing suite with programmes such as Final cut pro, Photoshop to add various special effects.  Due to me being in college I will not have to pay to use resources, but if I was not a member of the college to dry hire an editing suite would cost £250.00 a day.


Material

When trying to find when certain material can be used when trying to avoid the Copyright Act.  Companies such as Apple would be paid for product placement.  If a payment was avoided, this could result in Copyright strikes or even being sued by the company itself.


Contributors

When casting actors you would have to go through certain agencies in the result for publicity.   With me being in college, I will not have to pay actors and they will be my fellow classmates or friends.  This results in a low budget which allows you to spend in other areas of the production.


Locations

When finding locations to shoot, it can be very difficult if you do not have permission and often payment is required for the use of their location.  As I am a student I would have to ask for permission from the property owner or organisation to where I can shoot my webisode.


Health and Safety

Health and Safety would be paramount when making my webisode as in today society, people or staff will sue if an accident and their safety in put in danger.  This to consider:

location -  Are there sufficient to say filming is taking place, also tape to highlight area when the production crew are situated.

Equipment - has all equipment been PAC Tested to ensure that the crew do not have any electric shocks.

Props - Are all the props in good working order.




Mise en Scene


Locations: the location i would use would be filmed in an urban and city outlook due to the actors being matched apropiatley to their enviroment